My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0815
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0815
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:37 AM
Creation date
8/23/2005 9:43:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/15/2005
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 08/15/05 <br />Minutes - Page 8 <br /> <br />more information as to what had been done within the scope of <br />this particular area; was the park the only relevant location <br />needing to be addressed; and how other municipalities had <br />addressed similar concerns (i.e., New Brighton and Little <br />Canada). <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested that staff look at other <br />community ordinance, and whether such action would apply to <br />other housing complexes; opining she didn't support making <br />changes only for one area, when similar problems seemed <br />apparent in other areas (i.e., multi-family housing complexes, <br />town homes with private roads). <br /> <br />5. <br /> <br />Presentation of Public Works and Parks and Recreation <br />Budgets <br />Public Works Department <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz reviewed VarIOUS <br />components of the Public Works proposed 2006 Budget. <br /> <br />Public Works Administration and Engineering <br />Public Works Director Schwartz advised that his department was <br />requesting a basic "maintenance-level budget for 2006; and <br />proceeded to review various components of the department and <br />highlights of each, including Public Works Administration; <br />Streets; Street Lighting; Building Maintenance; Central Garage <br />and Utilities, including Sanitary Sewer, Water and Storm <br />Drainage. <br /> <br />Mr. Schwartz outlined costs for in-house versus outsourced <br />engineering services; 2006 goals and objectives; anticipated <br />TranStop Bus Shelter advertising and other revenue offsets. <br />Budget worksheets were reviewed for line-item specifics. <br /> <br />Mr. Schwartz further reviewed expenditure request for a city- <br />wide traffic model to determine traffic impacts from new <br />developments in an effort to determine if and when requests for <br />additional state and federal funding would be appropriate based <br />on those impacts, and with anticipated cost recovery through fees <br />assigned to specific development projects. <br /> <br />Public Works and <br />Parks and <br />Recreation Budgets <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.