Laserfiche WebLink
•--••...� - r , i-r <br />December �1, j'y,� <br />( <br />page Two <br />days the app���anfi hcrs submitted a io�ographica! survey of all fhe properties <br />in question and a revised si�e plan fc�r th� Country Kitc]�en site, You wiil <br />recaEl that the entire sife is 3.97 acres,. of wi�icF� i-he Cnuntry Kii-chen site is <br />approximately .8 acre (fronting on Rice Street). The proposed structure is <br />56 feet x 49 feet and is proposed to be a sit--do,,yn restcrurant with pccommodations <br />for 82 seats. i'h� cpr parking proposed now consist af 45 spaces, which excee�c�s <br />the minimum number required i�y the Code �] per each tf�ree seats), jhe <br />resta�ranfi is to be of sirriiiar design to an existing restpurcrnt at W}�i�e g��- q�,en�e <br />and tnterstaie 94 (southeast quadrant). <br />5. The site plan shows a curved drive-way coming from Rice Stre�t northefily to <br />the west side of the Country Kifichen site at a slope of b%. 7his isthe mctximum <br />slope suggesfed pp�ropriate for this purpose 6y �-he staff. There still rema�ns <br />a probfem with this slope in that access from this road to the remaining wesi�erly <br />�and wi�l be very steep withaut consiclerable filling to achieve a 6°lo down-siope <br />into the hole on i-he westerly properfiy. It would appear, ho�nr���r, t�pt access <br />to this westarly land covid 6e achieved if the long narrow stip. �}>owned by ti�e <br />appticant contiguous to Highway 36, were to !�e ad�ed to the �roperiy. Ac�ess <br />to fihe entire weSterJy ar�a cauld then b� gapned �y �-��n��s east off the drivev✓oy <br />where the t�rrain is less severe, prav:ding access ta the wesf, f n a�y C�S�� �� <br />4 would iae �xtre�eiy desira6le to not develap the westerfy area of the applicant's <br />properfiy unless i# is combined with �he long narrow strip alang Hig�way 3b. �f <br />this is dor�e, it would appeQr #hat access to the wes�erly areas ccr� be ad�quately <br />provided, <br />6. Our principal concern with respect to the site plan itsel� for the .Country Ki�h�n <br />Restauranir, is the fact that fihe por[cing lof is pro�os�d fio b� an a greater tl�a� <br />6% grade slope from north to souih. This, we suggest, is a very undesirable <br />condition for pe�r}�ose of provic�ing a safe efficienf porking pr�a �'ar fes3�QUrartt <br />�ustomers under a!I w�ather conditior�s. We have discussed this wit� the <br />appl icant and suggested thai they revise the grading plan so as to reduce fihe <br />J�'ade to an absolute maximum o� 4%, �'h� Qp���evnt's represen#afiye ;$ currently <br />aut of town, ancf expects to be bc�ck on Friday <br />, Novemh�r 2�th. V�/� stFangly <br />�g�est�d that a r�-,eeting with the staff and adjustm�nt of the pQr���g jo� Prior ta <br />�he Planning CQmmission is extremely desirabie. <br />7. !n 9�n�ra�, if�e plan worlcs well as drawn (if grades are adlusfied), The plan, however, <br />does r�oi� show the requ�red screening ond fencing for #he nori-l�erly and wesi-erly <br />portion of tF�e Iand cont�guous to the existing residentia! areas. T�� pja� ��S <br />provide for the 10 foot s�rip of plantable are�, but details as �o s�re���n� <br />technique and �er�cing are missing. The applicant has also been tolcf .of t�is <br />defficiency. <br />� <br />