Laserfiche WebLink
[G5� i�l:tt:i7�f: 87�-%r3 <br />�CI�£. TWO <br />lCenr►y Renhardt. P�;rcel 3 is t�nder o cdntract p�t�ci�ase �y Bar�y O'Meara, <br />one of the partners in t�e curseni- a;�piicotion for �he loir division. <br />6. In the �rocess of �xarr►ining the �easi�i�ity of i�F;e prapased roadway as shown <br />iri Plan A, your Encineering Sfaff is a�so r�viewing an alternat� propospi <br />which is showr, or+ Plan B. <br />7. In each cas�, access is �rovidect frorn Vic�oria to Sherren S�reet, so os tc� <br />open up the extr�mely long cul-de-sac which now exists on Sherren Sfire�t. <br />P}an A provides this ac�ess by ga+ng up the west ]ine of i'he pra�erty in <br />guestion, wi�ereas Plan 8 pr�vides f�is acc�ss hy con�ecYing 'to the end of <br />the cul-c�e-sac on Miit�n Street. <br />$. You wili notice in exrxrnining t3�e two plans, tF�ai- one af them would acco�nm4date <br />the proposed lat d€vision in question, v�hereas one nf t�,em (Plan $} �vi1i nofi. <br />�l�us it is obvious ihat in ordet to make a reasonal�le tEecision wi#n res�ec� to <br />the proposed iot in question, it is necessary ta deterrr�ine the b�s� ov�rcii plan <br />for the area to which this Int will ultima�eiy becorn� a part. °fan S ha$ four � <br />fewer lots than �'lan A, two of which are Iost on fihe applicant's oro}�erty whieFr <br />is shown �n gray on Plan A and 8. You wil! no�ice �hat P#an A has six Iots <br />for �he properfy in ques3-ian �inciuding the prop�sed lots far division) and <br />�� Pic�n B has four loirs for ;he sarne area. ThA reason far this �s bscause o� t�� <br />; e�Yreme feng�h of t'r:e lofs (r�orth-souf�s} �ecau�e of t;�� �na�i�i,y t� o�en up <br />t{�e nor�hw�st�rly par; of tt�e opp{icant`s property wii-F� t�e PEan 5 c'��'s�,n. <br />9. We understand l+11� . Renhardt favors Plan a, because his preperty can �e <br />served through the simale extertsion af a c�sl-�e-�rsc (th� c4�eap�st way ¢o <br />d�v�! op I and) . <br />IG. Thaugh we hav� not cfiscussed irh2 vari�c�s plans �vith a!! of ihe n�i�i,borsr '��er� <br />are somP who favor t�o develt�pment at c�il, s�m� �v�o favor Plan A, and obviously <br />same w�o favor Plan S, it should %e interP��ir�g and helpfvl to I�flrfl at til$ <br />public �earing irhe reaction fo the two alternat� plans. <br />11 . Ir► genera�, yve s�ggesi' Serious consitferafion of Plar�. A, inosmuch as i� <br />repr�sents a sfraight forward sol�i'ion, opening up i-he major �ort9ons af <br />land desired ta 6e c�evelaped, withvvt a�ening up an exis�ing cu�-ci�-sac <br />(end of Miltor� Streei�). Persons living an suc�► cui�de-sacs sometimes ob�ec} <br />to th� ioss of the cvl-de-sac charact�r to th� street with ac�ess from k�oth <br />ends. Plan A also is a rr�are ef;i�ient use of the 3anci withaut creating <br />excessiv�ly dsep lots running u� to 252 fest in deptl�. <br />