Laserfiche WebLink
Casp Number: 87�--75 <br />Paqe �hree <br />I2, i�€�� finaf decision on w�et�er Plan A ar �lan B is selec�erf will E�e cietermin�d <br />�y fihe City Council when the �ngi�sering feasibility repori- is reviewed. <br />{nasmuch as ti�e propo52d lot ti'svision COR b8 qCCUi"F1:ilOCJC��BCJ only on Pic�n A, <br />�E�e Cc�uncil will likely nrat take ac�ion �n fihe lat div�sion until i�e ch�ice <br />is made between th� plans. In i�h° rne�n t'sme, a r°comrnendat�ion from th� <br />Planning Comrriiss;on a5 to which plan they fee! is r�ore appropriate would be <br />l�elpful to fhe Council in their decision. <br />i3. We vndersi'and from reviewing the partially �omp3eted feasibility s�udy wifh <br />t!�e Engineering �ir�ff, i-hat Plan A is slight�y less cos�-ly than �lan B. ThQy <br />also 1llC�fCQ�B �{'1C1�' PIOC! B F1Q5 a 51g�11�ICQf1� G�fOtfiil� j7�O�I8R1 tiYI'1B1'2 the extension <br />oF Sandhurst goes down to meet the end of M�lton S#ree#. Additional information <br />wiil be presentec! 6y th� �ngine�ring staff relativ� to the merit of these <br />pr�posa{s. <br />{ `, <br />