My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0403
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0403
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:39 AM
Creation date
9/6/2005 12:38:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/3/2004
Meeting Type
Town Hall
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br />Minnesota, USA <br /> <br />Citizen Concerns and City Staff Responses <br /> <br />arising out of the <br /> <br />Community Town Hall Meeting <br />Saturday, April 3, 2004 <br /> <br />Fairview Community Center <br /> <br />On Saturday, April 3, the Roseville City Council held a Town Hall meeting. This was <br />the second of a three step effort to set goals for the 2005 City budget. Residents met one- <br />on-one with elected officials and staff to air their questions and concerns about City <br />government. Residents also had an opportunity to address the entire Council and the <br />public in attendance as a group. The videotape of that meeting is re-broadcast on cable <br />channel 16 and available for web casting 24/7/365 on the C- TV website. <br /> <br />The following is a synopsis of resident questions/concerns raised at the April 3 <br />Community Town Hall Meeting, and the City Staffs responses: <br /> <br />*********************** <br /> <br />Cl. Some residents expressed concern about the County closing County Road B at <br />Highway 280. Concerns revolved around possible crises in the northwest comer ofthe <br />City and the proximity of the neighborhood to the petroleum tank farms to the north. <br />Could the state and federal government reconsider the decision to close County Road B at <br />Highway 280? Whose idea was it to close County B? <br /> <br />Rl. The State's proposal and rationale for working with the County to close County <br />Road B at Highway 280 is to reduce traffic accidents associated with turning movements <br />along State Highway 280, including at the intersection of280 and County B. Using a <br />combination of State and federal funds, the State is proposing to improve Highway 280 in <br />2005 from approximately the Larpenteur interchange on the south to the point of <br />Highway 280's merger with Highway 36 on the north. The State and County believe this <br />will reduce accidents and injuries. <br /> <br />Emergency access from County B to 280 will be available through installation of a <br />knock-down barricade that would be built as part of the Project. Additional County <br />improvements are planned at the intersection of County Road B and Cleveland, also due <br />to safety concerns. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.