My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_0822
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_0822
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:27:41 AM
Creation date
9/13/2005 11:14:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Rules/Appointments
Meeting Date
8/22/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 08/22/05 <br />Minutes - Page 12 <br /> <br />revised the original motion, and Kough seconded the <br />modification to postpone action and send the request back <br />to the Planning Commission for their recommendation. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Schroeder; Kough and Maschka. <br />Nays: Klausing. <br />Motion Adopted. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding whether to provide <br />public notice regarding the Planning Commission <br />consideration of the request; with consensus of the City <br />Council that additional public notice would not be required <br />and was not intended as part of the motion. <br /> <br />4.d <br /> <br />Approve Dennis Guptil's Final PUD, 185 McCarrons <br />Boulevard (PF 3575) (former Consent Item 3.h) <br />At the request of Mayor Klausing, City Planner Thomas <br />Paschke briefly reviewed this request. <br /> <br />Ihlan moved to postpone consideration of this request to a <br />future meeting; opining she had several items for <br />discussion that she could submit to staff in writing, related <br />to a senior housing condominium complex; no site line <br />plan; parking issues; and the Park Dedication fee; for all of <br />which she would like additional information prior to voting <br />on the matter. <br /> <br />City Planner Paschke advised that, since preparation of the <br />Staff Report, most of the items had been resolved: payment <br />in lieu ofthe park dedication fee approved by the Parks and <br />Recreation Commission at $1,000 per unit; parking lot <br />lighting; the common practice for the proposal not to have <br />a photometric plan at this time, but required to meet City <br />code. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan provided additional detail to her <br />objections for approval at this time of the request, without <br />further information being provided, noting the sufficient <br />time frame available for consideration and action. <br /> <br />Ordinance 1325 <br />Dennis Guptil <br />Final PUD <br />185 McCarrons Bv <br />(PF 3575) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.