Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 08/22/05 <br />Minutes - Page 33 <br /> <br />Mr. Pratt noted that the purpose of this provIsIOn was to <br />eliminate any leftovers from storage. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson noted the intent of Mr. Pratt to <br />encourage the contractor to find a market for used equipment and <br />to remove it. <br /> <br />Page 23, Section 6.03, Marketing Agreements <br />Councilmember Schroeder questioned why the City was <br />concerned with the contractor's marketing agreements if he was <br />certifying the materials were marketable. Councilmember <br />Schroeder noted that Sections 7.01 and 7.06 on page 25 dealt <br />with the same thing. <br /> <br />Mr. Pratt noted that this was in reference to the revenue-sharing <br />portion of the contract. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that this provided additional <br />enforcement, referencing paragraph 7, to make certification and <br />copies of the contracts required. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder noted another typographical error on <br />the last paragraph of page 23, "meeting." <br /> <br />Page 29, Section 8.04, Revenue Sharing <br />Councilmember Schroeder suggesting tying that paragraph closer <br />to Section 6.03 (Marketing Agreements). <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that Section 6 dealt with annual <br />reporting, and the format of the RFP was better served with <br />Section 6 as a separate section, rather than including it in this <br />area related to Payment and Damages. <br /> <br />When questioned where the revenue sharing funds would be <br />applied, Mr. Pratt advised that this would be a future Council <br />discussion for their determination and direction. <br /> <br />Council consensus was to include Revenue Sharing discussion <br />on a future Study Session agenda. <br />