My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1974_0930_CC_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1974
>
1974_0930_CC_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/8/2014 12:28:12 PM
Creation date
3/6/2012 1:48:50 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
�c�ge Three. � Septem6er 4, i97� <br />and construct anorher 11 unit �ui�dang, so as to ultimateiy haVe four <br />� 11 unit 4��ildings in a row. To same this concept o� four simiiar buildings <br />in a line off�rs esthetic appeal. <br />6. If the Commission anci Council consider it im}�ortanfi to reduce the density in <br />accordance with the poiicy expressed in the comprehensive plan, the prnperty_ <br />could be developed with a"patio horr�e" concept utilizing a type of building <br />strvcture thafi iooks tnore lilce a large single famiiy horrte. Fxamp�es of such <br />units exist in Woodbury, Brooklyn Park, Cottage Grove, ancf other communities <br />i n the metropo[ i tan area . <br />7. Other zones in tne Roseville code allow for reduced rnu�iiple densities. The <br />R-4 zone allows 3 to 4 unit structures on 15,000 square feefi, The R-5 zone <br />altows 3 i-a 8 units structures with 7 units allowa6ie an 24,OOp square feet <br />(15,000 s�uare feet for i-he lst four and 3,000 square feet per unit for.each <br />addi tional uni t up to p i-otal of 8}, <br />The R-b zane (townhovse zone} requi res 4, 000 square feef per uni t up to an <br />maximum of 8 in c�np one buiid�ng. The prop�rty in question would t}�us a11ow <br />six ur;it� (1Q a;r�its per acre). <br />8. The choice would appear to be between (1) coni�inuing the exisi'ing farmat <br />wii�h consistanfi densities from LovelE to County Road B-2 (11 unit 6vildings} <br />or (2) consider a lesser c��nsity developmeni- form for the two rernaining <br />parcels s��h a5 r� 4 to 6 u�i t patio home or some form of '°townhousir�g" . <br />�We suggest that single famiiy development as expressed in the }�lan and can�irmed <br />by the Plqnning Comrrtission is not appro�riate for the site as expressed in the plan <br />and confirmed by tF�e Planning Comanission (]9b9 and 1973), <br />� <br />i <br />0 <br />� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.