My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_1121
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_1121
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:28:25 AM
Creation date
11/29/2005 10:04:42 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/21/2005
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session -11/21/05 <br />Minutes - Page 7 <br /> <br />League of Minnesota Cities (LMC) attorneys handling the <br />litigation for the City; his review of the case; and opinion that the <br />lawsuit was without merit. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing recommended that public comment be received <br />at the time the Council actually considered the Eminent Domain <br />process and resolution. Councilmembers concurred. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed concern that the Council had not <br />been updated on the pending litigation, while Mayor Klausing <br />and staff seemed to have more information available to them. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing clarified that the discussions had been held <br />between him, staff, and the complainant prior to the litigation <br />being pursued. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed her serious qualms in the City <br />pursuing what the pending litigation was alleging. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing duly noted Councilmember Ihlan's personal <br />concerns. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka noted that there was substantial <br />positioning occurring due to the sophisticated nature of the <br />project. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough sought clarification as to whether it <br />would be a majority vote required for the resolution. <br /> <br />Mr. Krass advised that the resolution would be a majority vote, <br />unless there were statutory restrictions applicable. <br /> <br />3. <br /> <br />Discuss 2006 Water & Sewer Fees <br />Finance Director Chris Miller reviewed staff s annual analysis of <br />the City's utility operations to determine whether rate <br />adjustments were necessary. Mr. Miller advised that each <br />operation (i.e., water, sanitary sewer, storm water drainage, and <br />recycling) was reviewed for fixed City costs, including <br />personnel, supplies, maintenance, and depreciation; variable <br />costs, including purchase of water from City of 8t. Paul, water <br />treatment costs paid to the Metropolitan Council and recycling <br /> <br />2006 <br />Water & Sewer <br />Fees <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.