Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Study Session -11/21/05 <br />Minutes - Page 8 <br /> <br />contractor costs; capital replacement costs; and current customer <br />base, rates and rate structure. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller anticipated an approximate average 5% overall <br />increase, based on normal consumption; and noted that staff <br />would return to the Council at a later date for formal action. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing requested staffs comment on Mr. Neprash's <br />previous comments and whether the City was adequately funded <br />for future storm water projects. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz advised that there was <br />currently an adequate reserve to cover the projected five (year) <br />Capital Improvement Program (CIP); and that of the identified <br />five problem areas in the City, three had been or were currently <br />being addressed. Mr. Schwartz noted that, the remaining two <br />were more difficult to solve (i.e., Mr. Neprash's neighborhood). <br /> <br />Discussion included annual Finance Department review of <br />department capital improvements and rate adjustments to <br />adequately address those improvements; rate structure for water <br />and sewer use during summer and winter months; and the need <br />to improve the condition of the water utility fund pending <br />numerous infrastructure maintenance upgrades. <br /> <br />Staff was directed to return with a formal request at the next <br />scheduled regular City Council meeting, November 28,2005. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing encouraged the public to provide input to the <br />City Councilor staff prior to that meeting. <br /> <br />4. <br /> <br />Discuss Revisions to 2006 Fee Schedule <br />Finance Director Chris Miller reviewed staff s annual <br />comprehensive analysis of the City's regulatory functions and <br />fee schedule. <br /> <br />Mr. Miller pointed out a typographical error on Page 10 of the <br />staff report dated November 21, 2005, for "Subdivision - <br />Minor** (Hearing) with the appropriate proposed cost for 2006 <br />to be $250.00, not $50.00 as shown (a $50.00 increase from 2005 <br />rates ). <br /> <br />Revisions to 2006 <br />Fee Schedule <br />