My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-03-06_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2012
>
2012-03-06_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/7/2012 3:41:28 PM
Creation date
3/7/2012 3:30:59 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I ROSEVILLE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION <br />2 MINUTES OF MEETING OF FEBRUARY 9, 2012 <br />3 ROSEVILLE CITY HALL — 6:30PM <br />4 <br />5 PRESENT: Azer, Diedrick, Doneen, Etten, D. Holt, M. Holt, Pederson, Ristow, Simbeck <br />6 ABSENT: Boehm called ahead with excused absence <br />STAFF: Anfang, Brokke <br />9 1. INTRODUCTIONS /ROLL CALL /PUBLIC COMMENT <br />10 FORParks Representatives in attendance, Janet Thul, Luella Zibell, Nancy Robbins and Marilyn Di <br />11 Martino presented the parks and recreation commission and staff a check for $50,000 to replace the <br />12 fountain in Lake Bennett, make improvements and upgrades to the interior of the Nature Center and <br />13 add /replace benches in Central Park. <br />14 <br />15 FORParks has had a long standing relationship with Roseville Parks &Recreation. Friends of Roseville <br />16 Parks has been very successful raising money over the years resulting in substantial contributions to the <br />17 Roseville Parks system over the past 40 years. <br />19 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES — JANUARY 3, 2012 MEETING <br />20 Minutes for the January 3, 2012 meeting were approved unanimously. <br />21 <br />22 3. MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DISCUSSION — PARK & RECREATION RENEWAL <br />23 PROGRAM <br />24 Jason Etten briefed the Commission on the first two Renewal Program Community and Neighborhood <br />25 meetings. <br />26 • The January 25th included information sharing on the 2012 projects and an overview of projects <br />27 and timelines for the four -year Renewal Program. <br />28 • On February 81h the Lexin on Park Neighborhood & Community meeting included sharing the <br />29 previously developed park master plan, updates on projects scheduled for 2012 and feedback <br />30 from the community on their ideas for Lexington Park. <br />31 <br />32 Brokke discussed the Best Value Procurement Process and how it will be used by the Renewal Program. <br />33 Jeff Evenson and Brad Tullberg from the Parks and Recreation staff along with Kris Giga from Public <br />34 Works will be trained in the Best Value principles and processes by Arizona State University. Their <br />35 training will not only be put to use by the renewal program but will also be available for other city -wide <br />36 development projects. <br />37 <br />38 Etten recognized the Council's unanimous support of the Best Value Process. Best Value application can <br />39 be applied to most everything we do. This is a broad, new way of thinking and working with huge <br />40 potential for the City of Roseville. <br />41 <br />42 Brokke updated the Commission on the status of the Renewal Program funding. The appeal hearing took <br />43 place February 8. No decision was made. The courts have up to 90 days to make their decision. Staff and <br />44 volunteers are respectfully and cautiously moving forward. We will do as much as we can without <br />45 spending much money and working internally. <br />46 <br />47 Dave Holt inquired into how the possible 90 day will affect future bond funding. Lonnie did not have an <br />48 answer and would guess that nothing more would be done until there is a ruling. <br />49 We are looking to leverage Renewal Program funds through grants — staff are working to submit an <br />50 application for Legacy funds for a Langton Lake shoreline and forest restoration and an application for a <br />51 Community Forestry grant to add to or replace public trees. <br />52 <br />53 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.