Laserfiche WebLink
during the PWETC review process. We anticipate a meeting or two <br />following staff review of the Progress Draft to discuss more cri <br />edits. <br /> <br />4. Online Tools. <br />a.We will be providing a stand-alone CSWMP deliverable that allows for effective <br />implementation. The online PermiTrack tools were not required, but we believe th <br />would enhance implementation of your surface water management prAs we <br />th <br />discussed on March 5, we believe the City should at least try the tools to see if th <br />value in using the tools towards managing your NPDES MS4 program <br />CSWMP and MS4 program activities are related, the City may see s using <br />one or more of the to0ls longer term. We will be in better position to help you see <br />where the tool could help as we learn more about your current pr <br />where you want the plan to guide you in the future. <br /> <br />5.Modeling Allowance. <br />a.If additional modeling is needed, we will address these as stand <br /> <br />6.Map-Based Deliverable. <br />a.Our approach is to add attributes to GIS based mapping to improv <br />plan and accessibility of the plan data. We recognize that the p <br />occurring in parallel to City efforts to begin implementation of asset management <br />software. Map-based deliverable(s) will be developed in concert with staffs v <br />future asset management tools to the greatest extent practical, including the potential <br />to shift some more detailed map development efforts into the implementation plan. <br /> <br />7.Project History. <br />a.We discussed the Chanhassen budget change related to the increas <br />surveys from the estimated 4500 to more than 6000. A second chan <br />was the additional of several individual drainage areas models and preliminary design <br />memorandums completed and included in the appendix of the Plan. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Roseville CSWMP  Confirmation of Scope 2 <br /> <br />