My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012_0312_Packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2012
>
2012_0312_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2012 3:27:33 PM
Creation date
3/8/2012 4:03:01 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
261
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I. <br />OVERVIEW OF PROCESS <br />ANDGENERAL INSTRUCTIONS <br /> <br />Carefully read the information contained in this RFP and email a complete response to all <br />requirements, specifications and directions. <br />A.QUESTIONS AND INQUIRIES <br />Questions submitted by email to the designated contact for the RFP will be answered until the <br />date noted in the Tentative Schedule of Events. Responses to written questions which involve an <br />interpretation or change to this RFP will be issued in writing by addendum and e-mailed to all <br />parties recorded by the City as having received a copy of this RFP. All such addenda issued by <br />the City prior to the time that proposals are received shall be considered part of the RFP. <br />Only additional information provided by formal written addenda shall be binding. Oral and other <br />interpretations or clarifications will be without legal effect. <br />B.TENTATIVE SCHEDULE OF EVENTS <br />Be advised that these dates are subject to change as the City deems necessary. <br />RFP Issue Date:January6,2012 <br />Pre Proposal Meeting11:00 a.m.,January 18, 2012 <br />Questions accepted about the RFP until:11:00 a.m.,February1,2012 <br />Proposals Due:3:30 p.m., February 3, 2012 <br />Council Meeting Date of Award:February 27, 2012 <br />C.EVALUATION CRITERIA <br />The Consultant selected for an award will be the firm whose proposal is responsive, responsible <br />and the most advantageous to the City, as determined by the City in its sole discretion. The City <br />intends to award a contract, subject to the terms of this RFP, to the best overall valued firm. <br />Firms will be prioritized based on fees, past performance, current performance capability,and <br />other criteria as outlined in this document. The City anticipates that all firms will have a fair and <br />reasonable opportunity to provide service. <br />Evaluation criteria will be weighed according to the following categories: <br />CATEGORYWEIGHTCRITERIA <br />Fees 40% Proposal <br />(Attachment B) <br />Project Scope Understanding 30% Proposal <br />(Attachment B) <br />Background and Qualifications20% Background/Qualifications <br />(Attachment E) <br />Past Performance Survey10% Survey Questionaire () <br />Attachment C <br />The City reserves the right to add/delete/modify criteria or times, via an addendum, if it is in the <br />City’s best interest, as determined by the City in its sole discretion. <br />D.ISSUANCE OF RFP AND AWARD PROCESS <br />Issuance of this RFP does not compel the City to award a contract. The City reserves the right to <br />reject any or all proposals wholly or in part and to waive any technicalities, informalities, or <br />irregularities in any proposal at its sole option and discretion. The City reserves the right to <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.