My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0227
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0227
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2012 1:32:11 PM
Creation date
3/14/2012 1:32:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/27/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, February 27, 2012 <br /> Page 12 <br /> ent segments of the community, whether youth or senior citizens. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee further noted the importance of matching volunteers to <br /> needs. <br /> Councilmember Johnson noted the advantages in pursuing an e-mail contact <br /> for a vast majority of volunteers, not currently being taken advantage of; al- <br /> lowing more volunteers to be contacted within various sectors of the commu- <br /> nity; as well as by communicating needs and coordinating through existing <br /> advisory commissions. <br /> Consensus was to keep this item as a long-term strategy, with a short-term <br /> plan for how best to coordinate that volunteer base as well as determining re- <br /> sources and financing issues. <br /> Since the item was already listed in the existing work plan (line 264), Mayor <br /> Roe directed staff to strike it from the January 30 list; with the short-term need <br /> being to reallocate resources to facilitate development. <br /> • Line 278—Improve Communication with Residents... <br /> After some discussion, it was the consensus that progress continued to be <br /> made; with social media another option to improve that communication; with <br /> citizen complaints continuing about the timing of agenda packet materials or <br /> discussion topics to allow the public time to response and/or comment (e.g. <br /> land use issues). <br /> Mayor Roe noted the distinction between when land use or development ap- <br /> plications are received and under staff review, but yet to become public in- <br /> formation, versus when they become public information and available for <br /> public comment or a formal Public Hearing depending on the type of applica- <br /> tion. From a strategic point of view, Mayor Roe noted the need to continue <br /> improving communication; and suggested retaining that as a short- and long- <br /> term strategy; however, he noted the need for further City Council discussion <br /> regarding further analysis for resource allocation. <br /> • Line 280—Increase Civic Engagement <br /> It was the consensus that this item was already listed in another category in <br /> the existing work plan; with the HRC Task Force coming forward shortly with <br /> a recommendation <br /> • Line 293 - Discuss/Implement ongoing, community-driven visioning process <br /> (page 12) <br /> Councilmember Johnson stated that his rationale in including this item, was <br /> his desire to continue updating the Imagine Roseville 2025 community vision- <br /> ing process, to ensure it didn't become stagnant or outdated. Councilmember <br /> Johnson suggested that one option would be to have advisory commissions <br /> review the document annually, as he'd previously suggested without result. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.