My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0524
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:30:09 AM
Creation date
2/9/2006 12:53:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/24/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - OS/24/04 <br />Minntes - Page 17 <br /> <br />Rick Pasch, 915 West County Road B-2 (east of Lexington) <br />Mr. Pasch spoke to his property's considerable drainage issues, <br />and the inefficiencies of remediation to-date. Mr. Pasch spoke in <br />support of the project if it included curb and gutter, or addressed <br />drainage issues. <br /> <br />Jan Vanderwall, 395 West Co Road C <br />Mr. Vanderwall spoke in his capacity of Transportation Manager <br />for the Roseville School District, noting that recent School Board <br />action had expanded the walking area for middle and high <br />schoolers to two miles. Mr. Vanderwall opined that this would <br />increase pedestrian traffic, and encouraged the Council to <br />consider the benefits of additional pathways, particularly along <br />County Road B-2. Mr. Vanderwall further spoke to the <br />condition of the roadway from his experience of substantial bus <br />traffic along that route, and spoke in support of reconstruction of <br />the roadway and/or pathway construction from a safety <br />standpoint. <br /> <br />Nancy Pleiss, 184 W County Road B-2 <br />Ms. Pleiss spoke in opposition to a pathway project, as a resident <br />that would be impacted, opining that there were parks for <br />recreational purposes, and additional pathways were not needed. <br />Ms. Pleiss opined the detrimental affects of eliminating trees, the <br />unattractiveness of pathways, increased taxes or special <br />assessments; and recommended that the Council not consider the <br />project just to capture federal funding. Ms. Pleiss spoke in <br />support of corrections to existing drainage issues. <br /> <br />Mark McCahill, 2164 Rosewood Lane N <br />Mr. McCahill spoke in support of additional pathways in the <br />community. Mr. McCahill opined that, as a runner, pedestrian <br />safety on public roadways was a primary concern. <br /> <br />No one else appeared for or against. <br /> <br />Due to a considerable number of residents in the audience for <br />this item, Mayor Klausing polled the audience on their support <br />and/or opposition to a proposed pathway project. The opposition <br />was represented more strongly than the proponents. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.