My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0524
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:30:09 AM
Creation date
2/9/2006 12:53:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/24/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - OS/24/04 <br />Miuutes - Page 18 <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough spoke adamantly regarding his <br />opposition to additional pathway projects at this time. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding trail segments; budget <br />restrictions; additional maintenance requirements; right-of-way <br />acquisitions and temporary construction easements; roadway <br />widths and alignments. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of this project, due to <br />availability of federal funding, and addressed benefits versus <br />detriments to the community (i.e., public safety, drainage issues). <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder opined his endorsement and support <br />of reconstruction of County Road B-2, but reiterated his <br />philosophy that the city construct no additional pathways, <br />sidewalks or trails, until able to maintain those we currently <br />have. Councilmember Schroeder also addressed his concern for <br />where additional funding would come from to pursue this <br />project, even with federal funding; and also noted that a portion <br />of the pathway was proposed in an area that consisted of truck <br />terminals. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding street lighting; timing of the <br />project; whether County Road C or County Road B-2 would be <br />considered the City's "main corridor;" setback issues and federal <br />requirements for their funding; maintenance concerns. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in support of considering the project at <br />this time. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka concurred in his support of pursuing <br />the project at this time, inclusive with reconstruction of County <br />Road B-2. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Ihlan seconded, directing staff to order plans <br />and specifications for a pathway project from Walnut to <br />Lexington as delineated during tonight's discussion, including <br />recommendations of Councilmember Schroeder for other <br />terminuses on Walnut. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.