My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0524
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0524
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:30:09 AM
Creation date
2/9/2006 12:53:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/24/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - OS/24/04 <br />Minutes - Page 20 <br /> <br />for recommendation on May 5, 2004, with conditions as listed on <br />the staff report dated May 24,2004. Mr. Welsch noted that staff <br />concurred with the Planning Commission's recommendation; <br />and further noted that the applicant was present at tonight's <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder requested clarification of the nature <br />of the cooperative ownership structure. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested clarification of environmental <br />assessments performed to-date, expressing concern regarding <br />potential contamination of chemicals used during greenhouse <br />operations. <br /> <br />Mike Theis, Greenhouse Village Properties (Developer) <br />Mr. Theis clarified that Greenhouse Village Properties was the <br />developer, not Theis Custom Homes, as implied on the Council <br />agenda. <br /> <br />Mr. Theis responded to Councilmember Schroeder and Ihlan's <br />questions regarding cooperative housing and potential <br />contaminants on the site. Mr. Theis opined that his firm was <br />satisfied with environmental testing performed to-date and that <br />all environmental hazards had been recognized. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing noted that tonight's request was for a concept <br />plan and to consider whether this land use made sense; and that <br />the other issues would be addressed for remediation in preparing <br />the final plan. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued between the developer, <br />Councilmember Ihlan and Community Development Director <br />Welsch related to the Planning Commission's intent for <br />Condition 8.7 on the staff report dated May 24,2004. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka requested clarification of the intended <br />structure of the owners' association and agreements for the <br />townhouse units and the cooperative units. <br /> <br />Mr. Theis responded that two separate assoclatlOns were <br />planned, with cooperative agreements for parking and roadway <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.