My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0712
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0712
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:30:25 AM
Creation date
2/13/2006 11:59:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/12/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
45
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 07/12/04 <br />Minutes - Page 35 <br /> <br />that in understanding retail development, the Rosedale trade <br />area was considered 100% feasible space, and that since retail <br />was not a weak market, and retail changes prove to be positive, <br />there would be no competition with the potential lessees at <br />either existing shopping center. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing thanked the development team for their <br />comments. <br /> <br />9. <br /> <br />Twin Lakes Moratorium Ordinance <br />Community Development Director Dennis Welsch reviewed the <br />need to address ongoing development and/or redevelopment <br />within the Twin Lakes area; reviewed the definition and <br />purpose of a moratorium that addressed only new projects being <br />considered in the Twin Lakes study area; and the time frame of <br />approximately one year for a moratorium, or upon repeal by the <br />City Council. Staff recommended that the City Council hold <br />the first reading and gather additional input. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan sought clarification of the proposed <br />interim ordinance, and where it would be applicable for land use <br />approvals and formal applications, and whether it included <br />application from the development team. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued related to interim uses; and the review and <br />permitting processes. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson clarified the intent and provisions of <br />the proposed ordinance in putting a hold on the application <br />process for permit requests and the City's legal obligation to act <br />within sixty days, in an effort to protect the planning process in <br />the Twin Lakes area, as addressed in Section 3 of the staff <br />report dated July 12, 2004. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing opined that the City Council wanted to prevent <br />inconsistent uses from coming forward in the Twin Lakes <br />development area, thus the need for the moratorium. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined her preference that the master <br />developer be included in the process, along with any other <br /> <br />Twin Lakes <br />Moratorium <br />Ordinance <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.