Laserfiche WebLink
47 <br />48 <br />49 <br />50 <br />51 <br />52 <br />53 <br />Roseville Human Rights Commission <br />February 22, 2012 - Draft Minutes <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />Open meetings law that protects the citizens' right to know outweighs the convenience of <br />the commission members. <br />Ms. Beckman noted the City Council's email policy and suggested the Commission follow it. City <br />Manager Bill Malinen clarified that all commissioners are subject to the electronic communications <br />policy. He said communications should be one way to avoid unintentional violation of the law. <br />54 Chair Grefenber�opened the discussion with statin� that he had chan�ed his mind re ag rdin� <br />55 wisdom of allowing all commissioners to attend an_y committee meeting and wondered whether <br />56 there were other wavs to allow full communication between coinmissioners and to foster a sense of <br />57 cohesion and camaraderie amon� commissioner without requiring every meetin�posted. He <br />58 gave an example of a recent coinmittee meeting which he had advised a commissioner not attend <br />59 because the meeting had not been posted. <br />60 <br />61 �'������;��°�-� Chair Grefenber� � raised the issue of the best way to share <br />62 communications, asking whether communicating about logistics for a program or trying to schedule <br />63 a meeting would violate the law. City Attorney Beckman� a�reed that it would not; the <br />64 discussion must be about official business. An email about time of a meeting or refreshments <br />65 would not be considered official business, but it could give the appearance of a discussion. She <br />66 warned against someone adding something about official business that would make it a violation of <br />67 the open meetings law. <br />68 <br />69 Commissioners asked about the HRC ��rule� which allows any commissioner e-a� to attend <br />70 any committee meeting, which may mean a quorum of the commission. City Attorney Beckman <br />71 said if keeping that policy all meetings must be noticed, and meetings are open and should be in a <br />72 public venue. <br />73 <br />74 <br />75 <br />76 <br />77 <br />78 <br />79 <br />80 <br />Chair Grefenberg discussed other wa,ys to prevent meetin�s from involvin�a quorum and AttorneX <br />Beckman a�reed they would work as well. <br />Commissioner Groff suggested that committees be limited to three members to prevent a violation. <br />Some commissioners expressed interest in attending a committee if they plan to discuss a specific <br />topic. <br />81 Commissioner Kristin Doneen expressed her concern that there ma_y be times when a Commissioner <br />82 is interested in attendin� a Committee meetin�, and that this does not necessarily mean that the <br />83 discussion warrants time at the regular Commission meeting. An exam�le was a book list for the <br />84 upcomin� book club; if Commissioners want to be part of this discussion, then theY may desire to <br />85 attend the Programming Committee where the_y discuss it. She proposed that, in such cases, the <br />86 Commissioner wanting to attend notify the Committee so that the meeting could then be noted. The <br />87 attorney said that this would be a way of handlin� such cases. <br />88 � <br />89 City Manager Malinen said he was concerned about t#� transparency. The public recognizes and <br />90 expects the HRC to meet at a regular time and place, and by calling committee meetings, the public <br />91 does not necessarily know of the time and location of committee meetings. He suggested that <br />