Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 07/26/04 <br />Minutes - Page 38 <br /> <br />issuance and car/truck dealership licensing. Mr. Miller <br />noted that the position would be paid through user fees <br />and non property tax dollars. <br />Mr. Miller noted that exit strategies had been identified for both <br />positions. <br /> <br />Discussion included the types and amount of profit realized from <br />the License Center operation; beneficiaries of those profits; and <br />value-added services provided by the City of Roseville, creating <br />increased volume and respect within the service areas <br />represented. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing opened the discussion for public comment. <br /> <br />Dan Roe, 2100 Avon Street <br />Mr. Roe spoke to City Manager Beet's recommendation for <br />incentive pay, from a private sector perspective, encouraging <br />care in providing fair incentives making sure that everyone was <br />eligible to prevent resentment among employees. Mr. Roe <br />suggested that, if the incentives were approved by the City <br />Council, have the employees involved in developing job <br />performance issues. Mr. Roe concluded by noting that incentive <br />pay was difficult to budget for, and suggested that perhaps <br />encouraging departments to come in under their annual allotted <br />budget could serve as an incentive itself (similar to profit sharing <br />plans in the private sector), and the savings pooled, and <br />distributed to eligible employees based on a percentage of their <br />Income. <br /> <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that multi-tier salaries were inadvisable <br />in the public sector where salaries were public information. Mr. <br />Kysylyczyn noted that while public employees were not paid as <br />much as private sector employees, there were other benefits they <br />realized (i.e., paid holidays and job security). Mr. Kysylyczyn <br />questioned whether an incentive program would be applicable to <br />non-union staff, as performance benchmarks in union positions <br />were easily identified. <br /> <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that community surveys, in general, had <br />proven nothing less than a complete waste of taxpayer funds. <br />