Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Dennis Welsch <br />August 9, 2004 <br />Page 4 <br />plan. Generally, a municipality should not adopt zoning that conflicts with ifis comprehensive <br />plan. However, the mere fact that such a conflict might exist does not invalidate an ordinance, <br />nor a decision made under that ordinance. Were such a conflict found to exist between a <br />zoning ordinance and/or a comprehensive plan, one or the other could be amended. <br />After reviewing the comprehensive plan provisions that are pertinent to the Twin Lakes <br />redevelopment area, and the section of the Roseville City Code that deals with Mixed Use <br />Business Park Districts, I am of the opinion that no conflict exists between the Master Plan and <br />the Comprehensive Plan. Thus, at this juncture and based upon the facts as presented to me, I <br />see no involvement of or need to take action on the city's overall comprehensive plan in <br />regards to this development stage in the Twin Lakes master plan project. <br />CONCLUSION <br />A supplement or amendment to a site specific master plan such as the Twin Lakes <br />master plan is not a change to the city's comprehensive plan. Such a change to the master plan <br />can occur through a simple majority vote of the governing body pursuant to the appropriate <br />motion and resolution. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />~'~ <br />Scott T. Ande so <br />STA/cmp <br />RRM: 65909 <br />