My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0816
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0816
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:06 AM
Creation date
2/14/2006 3:00:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/16/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
44
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 08/16/04 <br />Minutes - Page 16 <br /> <br />taxpayer's investment; and increased Inandates and needs (i.e., <br />tumback of Roselawn Avenue west of Snelling Avenue; <br />additional street mileage with development at Applewood <br />Pointe; increased maintenance of streetscapes, rights-of-way and <br />trails to the increased expectations of the taxpayers; increased <br />maintenance with completion of additional facilities at the City <br />Center Complex; and increased inspections and security related <br />to Homeland Security mandates) and the way those items impact <br />the department and increase costs. Mr. Schwartz advised that <br />his department would do their best to maintain expected levels of <br />service as close to existing as possible, but noted the service <br />level impacts that would be impacted with further staff <br />reductions. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder sought clarification on cost savings <br />projected to eliminate the City's participation in the leaf <br />collection program, with residents delivering their leaves to the <br />collection site. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Schwartz responded that the City would <br />still need to remove leaves from catch basins, but anticipated <br />cost savings annually would be approximately $25 - 30,000. <br />Mr. Schwartz estimated that the program cost between $80 - <br />100,000 to operate, with approxin1ately $23,000 revenue <br />generated; but that elimination of the program would also allow <br />allocation of personnel to other maintenance areas during the <br />month of November, the most intense time for leaf collection. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted that the City's maintenance pro graIn was <br />year-round; and that the costs of the program were allocated to <br />the City's stann water utility fee, and would not represent any <br />savings to the General Fund Levy. <br /> <br />Further discussion included the contract labor hired for the leaf <br />collection program; participation fees and their relationship to <br />reduced participation in the collection program; and advantages <br />or disadvantages of continuing to subsidize the program. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough sought clarification on the nun1ber of <br />times the streets were swept each year, and the cost of contract <br />services for that program. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.