Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 01/30/06 <br />Minutes - Page 12 <br /> <br />Subdivision to create three parcels, one with an existing house Road B (PF 3699) <br />that meets or exceeds all city regulations for an interior lot, a <br />second parcel ( vacant) meeting or exceeding all requirements for <br />an interior lot, and the third parcel (vacant) meeting all <br />requirements for the comer lot at County Road B and Acorn <br />Road. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch noted that Mr. Forman had originally applied for a <br />variance to lot frontage for Parcel C along County Road Band <br />that, while the Planning Commission recommended approval of <br />a variance, Mr. Forman withdrew his variance request, and <br />revised the request, following substantial neighborhood <br />disapproval of his original request. Mr. Welsch noted that both <br />staff and the Planning Commission recommended approval of <br />the Minor Subdivision request. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that the Council agenda was ahead <br />of projected time listed on the Council Agenda and suggested <br />holding discussion on this item until the proposed time to allow <br />public comment. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing took Councilmember Ihlan's concerns into <br />consideration and would be, flexible, but noted that the City <br />Council meeting started at 6:00 p.m. and the times listed were <br />only projections. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that she intended to ask the new City <br />Council to reconsider a moratorium on new subdivisions in the <br />near future; opining that the number of subdivision requests <br />continued to grow to the consternation of neighboring property <br />owners regarding loss of trees and open space. <br /> <br />Ihlan moved to table discussion of this subdivision request to <br />allow time for reconsideration of a moratorium. Mayor Klausing <br />declared the motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan brought concerns to the Council's <br />attention regarding adequate notice, specifically addressing the <br />January 24, 2006 letter from George LeTendre, and attorney and <br />neighboring property owner, threatening a lawsuit if the City <br />Council approved the applicant's request; and noted that she had <br />