My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0913
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:31 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 10:46:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/13/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 09/13/04 <br />Minutes - Page 20 <br /> <br />created a negative atmosphere in Roseville for development. <br /> <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that there should be no issue on the part <br />of the City Council with this application. Mr. Kysylyczyn <br />concurred with the comments of City Attorney Anderson <br />regarding definition of shopping center use; further opining that <br />the Twin Lakes proj ect was different from this proj ect in that no <br />public subsidy was being requested. Mr. Kysylyczyn further <br />opined that, since no public monies were requested, staff should <br />be allowed to work with the developer to revise the plan <br />accordingly. <br /> <br />Todd Guerrero, 2474 Hamline Avenue N <br />Mr. Guerrero disagreed with whether the City needed a <br />SuperTarget and questioned whether it fit with the City's needs. <br />lvir. Guerrero spoke against changing the Comprehensive Plan to <br />accommodate Target's needs; and encouraged keeping Roseville <br />more of a small town community, rather than building <br />superstores in the community. <br /> <br />Gale Pederson, 929 Roselawn Avenue W <br />Ms. Pederson opined that Target had proven a good business <br />partner for the City of Roseville, provided a good tax-base, and <br />while bigger might not be better, the City shouldn't lose them as <br />part of the community. Ms. Pederson further opined that the <br />City couldn't afford to send business to other communities; and <br />that since "T -1" was the first store and was built in Roseville, <br />which should stand for something in the community. Ms. <br />Pederson concluded by stating she would hate to see the City of <br />Roseville lose Target Corporation as a partner in the community. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing closed public comment related to this item at <br />8:38 p.m. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder opined that it appeared there was an <br />attempt to micro-manage the project to influence broader <br />concepts. Councilmember Schroeder further opined that the <br />question wasn't whether to trust Target Corporation, but whether <br />to trust staff. Councilmember Schroeder stated that the City had <br />a professional staff, and the Council needed to trust them. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.