My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0913
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:31 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 10:46:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/13/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 09/13/04 <br />Minutes - Page 30 <br /> <br />Note: Referenced City Manager Recommendations taken from City Manager's <br />2005 Budget Memo distributed in July of 2005, pages 21-22 and 25 - 26. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets noted that the preliminary calculations had <br />anticipated $200,000 in revenue to contribute to the 2005 <br />Budget; but that n10re detailed work was needed to determine the <br />actual fee and an10unt of revenue potential available for the <br />General Fund. <br /> <br />Councilmelnber Schroeder opined his lack of support for a "fee" <br />that was in actuality a non-levied tax. Councilmember Schroeder <br />noted that an electrical franchise fee was not optional as was a <br />cable fee; and also questioned the feasibility of burying electric <br />lines. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing asked for comment and/or consent for <br />consideration of other issues from the makers of the motion. <br /> <br />Councilmen1ber Maschka opined his flexibility in considering <br />any options; but reiterated his preference to solving the structural <br />budget issues ilnn1ediately, or at a minimum over the next two <br />budget year cycles. Councilmember Maschka also reiterated his <br />preference to let the taxpayers, through public comment and <br />feedback to the City Council individually and corporately, <br />respond to the proposed levy increase as it related to services and <br />quality of life. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with Councilmember Maschka's <br />comments, but expressed the need to achieve a balance of <br />increased revenue sources versus decreased service levels due to <br />staff reductions. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing also noted the original intent of the Naturalist at <br />the Nature Center as a revenue generator, with the position <br />anticipated to be revenue-neutral. Mayor Klausing opined that <br />further discussion was needed to determine if that original intent <br />was feasible, whether the City would continue to subsidize it, or <br />whether the difficult decision needed to be made to eliminate the <br />position. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.