My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0920
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0920
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:39 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 12:18:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/20/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 09/20/04 <br />Minutes - Page 19 <br /> <br />Casserly noted that, in this scenario, the City would design <br />the Redevelopment Agreement, if the project moves <br />forward, to determine the actual land value and determine a <br />formula to write down costs. <br /> <br />Mr. Casserly estimated that, on the private side of the <br />developer, to build the project would probably be within <br />the range of $175,000 to $190,000, in addition to the $65 <br />Million in land costs. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated previous statements <br />regarding the City's control of the land and her opposition <br />to the use of ED for acquiring land for private developers. <br /> <br />Mr. Roe responded that the City had control, through the <br />signing or not signing of a Development Agreement; and <br />also opined that the square footage of retail per capita <br />included vacant land in Wyoming, and should be taken into <br />consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Roe concluded that the developer would need to <br />demonstrate the "but for" test for use of TIF. <br /> <br />P. Steven Carlson <br />Mr. Carlson noted his proxImIty to the site; but also <br />addressed the financial aspects. Mr. Carlson recognized <br />the value of tonight's comments and discussion in helping <br />him to better understand the overall proj ect. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson questioned whether the proposed high-density <br />housing would change the environment of the area, <br />including the addition of retail, and impact the quality of <br />life of residents in the area of the site. <br /> <br />Mr. Carlson opined that the project would have a negative <br />impact on residential property values within a one-mile <br />radius of the project site, and asked that the Council take <br />that into consideration. <br /> <br />Q. Carol Erickson, 2529 Mildred Avenue <br />Ms. Erickson, as a proponent of the project, opined that the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.