Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Study Session -10/18/04 <br />Minutes - Page 5 <br /> <br />budget for presentation to the City Council at their November 15, <br />2004 Study Session; and for presentation to the Community at <br />the Truth-in- Taxation Public Hearing scheduled for December 6, <br />2004. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets stated that the purpose and intent of <br />tonight's discussion would be to look at potential revenue <br />sources to sustain the City over the long-term to replace state <br />revenue; or long-term changes in spending presently supported <br />by taxes; and asked for clear Council direction to staff to allow a <br />final budget form to be presented to the City Council before <br />year-end. <br /> <br />Council consensus was to provide clear direction to staff in <br />whatever form seemed most appropriate, via formal action or by <br />clear consensus. <br /> <br />SPECIFIC DISCUSSION <br />1. To achieve structural balance in the City's operating <br />budget: <br /> <br />A. Add new long-term, non-tax revenue sources? <br /> <br />1. Should Council create a Street Light Fee? <br /> <br />City Manager Beets reviewed the specifics of state law related to <br />local municipalities and operation of street lights, estimating that <br />the City spent an estimated $170,000 annually for electricity for <br />street lights, in addition to replacement of poles and light <br />fixtures. Mr. Beets suggested a fee charged to each property <br />owner in Roseville, similar to that charged to support the City's <br />stormwater program. Mr. Beets advised that the fees could be <br />included on quarterly utility bills; and was technically an <br />assessment, and if approved, would need to follow the Public <br />Hearing process prior to implementation and demonstration of <br />the actual cost for street light operations would need to be <br />provided at that hearing. <br /> <br />Discussion <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined her support and preference for <br />applying the cost as a property tax as part of the levy, rather than <br />