Laserfiche WebLink
<br />assert that they working on this problem. is the position <br /> <br />of Friends of Twin Lakes that all analysis must be complete <br /> <br />and a full mitigation strategy in place before any approvals are <br /> <br />given for any redevelopment in the area. (See Meg Rattei <br /> <br />Materials) <br /> <br />2. The 7050 Rule changes have completed their first <br /> <br />round of statewide hearings. Steve Heiskary, Research <br /> <br />Scientist with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency writes: <br /> <br />"Based on what we have been made aware of regarding the <br /> <br />proposed development and the sensitivity of this small shallow <br /> <br />lake to additional nutrient loading it would seem prudent of <br /> <br />the City Council to request further study of the lake and the <br /> <br />potential for water quality impacts from the proposed <br /> <br />development." (See Meg Rattei Materials) <br /> <br />3. The stated assumption of the 2001 AUAR is that this <br /> <br />area is not unique and contains no wildlife save rabbits, <br /> <br />squirrels, crows, etc. This is clearly an important assumption <br />