My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_1206
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_1206
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:32:52 AM
Creation date
2/16/2006 1:03:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/6/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
66
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 12/06/04 <br />Minutes - Page 24 <br /> <br />record. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder called for a Point of Order, <br />questioning Councilmember Ihlan' s intent in reiterating her <br />arguments. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that she was attempting to make the <br />legal arguments to persuade Councilmembers to consider <br />granting the petition. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder opined his preference for staff s <br />interpretation and their expertise in the matter, but offered his <br />recognition of hearing out Councilmember Ihlan's opinions, <br />philosophy and interpretations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan presented proposed amendments to draft <br />resolution granting petition for environmental worksheet, <br />December 6, 2004. Councilmember Ihlan concluded her <br />comments by opining that under the technical legal language of <br />the rule, it was her interpretation and opinion that, based on the <br />evidence on record and applicable to the rule, the AUAR was no <br />longer valid. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing respectfully disagreed with Councilmember <br />Ihlan's legal interpretation; and reminded Councilmember <br />Kough, related to his previous comments, that tonight's decision <br />was not about a land use application, but whether the AU AR <br />remained valid, or whether preparation of an EA W was advised. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jay Squires concurred with Mayor Klausing's <br />comments regarding any future land use process and the various <br />requirements that could be addressed at that time, depending on <br />the actions of the City Council tonight. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka spoke in favor of the motion; opining <br />that he didn't believe any thresholds had been met, that the <br />preponderance of evidence provided supported the validity of the <br />AUAR, and that the end product would prove a vastly improved <br />area for the Ci ty. Councilmember Maschka noted that the <br />process ahead of the developer and the City Council would <br />address the environmental issues brought forward, as well as <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.