CC_Minutes_2004_1206 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

example, letters from the Minnesota DNR dated November 10, 2004; letter from Thomas Soulen dated November 9, 2004; letter from Rebecca Ternes dated November 11, 2004; letter from Terry ]\rIoses dated October 21,2004; letter from Cathy Guerrero dated September 19, 2004; letter from H.A. Wells to Planning Commission dated October 14, 2004). The council finds on this basis that important assumptions and background conditions of the AUAR are substantially in error, and that environmental impacts of redevelopment on these unique reSOUl'ces have consequently been substantially underestimated. G. The AUAR assumed that there are no "scenic views and vistas" in the redevelopment area (AUAR paragTaph 26d, p. 55) and that there will be no identified "visual impacts" from redevelopment (AUAR paragraph 27, p. 55). The AUAR did not identify scenic views and vistas of Langton Lake or in Langton Lake Park as sensitive resources or analyze impacts from redevelopment. The AUAR also failed to identify or analyze visual impacts such as "glare from intense lights" or "lights visible in wilderness areas" such as the wooded areas of Langton Lake Park. There is information in the record to indicate that the proposed Rottlund plan will impact scenic views and have other identified visual impacts relating to the height of buildings and light from the development. For these reasons, the council finds that important assumptions of the AUAR are substantially in error as to possible impacts on scenic views and vistas and other visual impacts, and that environmental impacts of redevelopment have been substantially underestimated as a result. 10. Under Rule 4410.3610, Subpart 7, Paragraph H, he council determines that the following substantial changes have occurred that may affect the potential for, or magnitude of, adverse environmental impacts: A. Groundwater contamination involving the hazardous chemical TeE has been discovered in the area. (See discussion in paragraph 9(A) above) B. State water quality rules governing water quality standards applicable to the Langton Lake and Twin Lakes area were amended in 2002, after the AUAR was conducted and adopted in 2001. Further amendments to these rules are expected to take effect in 2005. (See discussion in paragraph 9(B) above). C. The land uses proposed by Rottlund are significantly different from the land uses assumed under the AUAR. (See discussion in paragraph 6 above). D. The proposed location of Twin Lakes Parkway is substantially changed from AUAR assumptions. (See discussion in paragraph 7W above.) 5