My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0203
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0203
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:33:31 AM
Creation date
2/17/2006 11:40:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/3/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 2/3/03 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Kough, Klausing, Maschka, Schroeder and <br />Kysylyczyn. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />IX. <br /> <br />Organizational Business <br /> <br />A. Legal Newspaper Reselection <br />City Attorney Squires addressed past discussion and the <br />written legal opinion from City Attorney Anderson dated <br />January 27, 2003 regarding legal and practical issues in <br />the selection of the 2003 official legal newspaper for the <br />City of Roseville. <br /> <br />Kysylyczyn moved, Schroeder seconded authorizing staff <br />to re-open the Request for Proposals (RFP) process, <br />identifying four (4) newspapers as previously considered, <br />in addition to the Spokesman Recorder and the St. Paul <br />Legal Ledger, as well as other potential legal newspapers. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn explained his rationale for including <br />additional newspapers in the RFP process, identifying the <br />newspapers as having recently submitted bids to the <br />Ramsey County Board for consideration as their legal <br />newspaper. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough spoke against the motion, opining <br />that the previous process was submitted in a timely <br />fashion, and questioned how the Council could go back on <br />their original motion; expressing his support of the St. <br />Paul Pioneer Press bid and suggesting other papers would <br />have an opportunity in 2004 for consideration. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder sought City Attorney Squires' <br />legal opinion as to whether a contract existed between the <br />City and the Pioneer Press. <br />City Attorney Squires responded by using the opinion of <br />City Attorney Anderson in his letter, identifying the <br />existing opinion of the State's Attorney General. Mr. <br />Squires stated that, based on statute, there wasn't anything <br />statutory, but some case law would support the conclusion <br /> <br />Organizational <br />Business <br /> <br />Legal Newspaper <br />Reselection <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.