My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0213
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:34:23 AM
Creation date
3/7/2006 1:42:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/13/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 02/13/06 <br />Minutes - Page 12 <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned where remaining monies <br />will would come from. <br /> <br />Mr . Welsch responded that any costs above those proj ected <br />in the TIF District would be paid by the developer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan questioned whether all criteria had <br />been met for hazardous substance grant approval. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch responded that certification had already been <br />recorded and approved by Ramsey County. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that neither of the proposed <br />contracts provided "not-to-exceed" clauses; and proposed <br />amendments for their inclusion in each contract. <br /> <br />Ihlan moved, Pust seconded, amending both proposed <br />Consultant Services Agreements to include not-to-exceed <br />amounts: compensation for the contract for management of <br />existing grants at a not-to-exceed amount of $10,000 for <br />2006; and compensation for the contract for management <br />of new grants at a not-to-exceed amount of $5,000 for each <br />individual grant application cycle. <br /> <br />Discussion included the Scope of Services; wording of not- <br />to-exceed provisions; potential increases to the contract for <br />new grants; and implications for limit language. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Kough; Pust; Ihlan; Maschka and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, an amendment to both <br />proposed contracts as follows: <br />Delete: "It is understood that the City will seek <br />reimbursement for the costs associated..." and <br /> <br />Agreement for managing existing grants: "The <br />Redeveloper is responsible for payment of all <br />Consultant service fees under this Agreement. The <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.