My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0213
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:34:23 AM
Creation date
3/7/2006 1:42:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/13/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 02/13/06 <br />Minutes - Page 13 <br /> <br />Redeveloper shall deposit the not-to-exceed amount <br />of $10,000 into an escrow account before any service <br />fee payments are made to Consultant. All payments <br />to Consultant for services under this Agreement shall <br />be made from the Redeveloper escrow account, not <br />from City funds." OR <br /> <br />Insert (for Agreement for managing new grants): <br />"The Redeveloper is responsible for payment of all <br />Consultant service fees under this Agreement. The <br />Redeveloper shall deposit the not-to-exceed amount <br />of $10,000 into an escrow account before any service <br />fee payments are made to Consultant for services <br />rendered in each grant application agreement cycle. <br />All payments to Consultant for services under this <br />Agreement shall be made from the Redeveloper <br />escrow account, not from City funds." <br /> <br />Discussion included an explanation of an escrow account; <br />City Attorney Anderson's pending review of and potential <br />disallowance for potential escrow account language in <br />relationship to the existing June 20, 2005 development <br />agreement between the developer and City; and staff s <br />attempts for transparency in current agreement language <br />and payment processes. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan responded to City Attorney <br />Anderson's legal comments, opining that the developer <br />should be amenable to being part of this agreement and <br />putting money in escrow. Councilmember Ihlan expressed <br />her concern regarding her status as a public official signing <br />off that the developer was making payments in full; and <br />further opined that an escrow account would allow for <br />more transparency. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing concurred with City Attorney Anderson's <br />legal opinion and its relevancy to the contract currently <br />before the City Council. <br /> <br />At the request of Councilmember Kough, City Attorney <br />Anderson clarified the existing June 20, 2005 agreement <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.