My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0213
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0213
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:34:23 AM
Creation date
3/7/2006 1:42:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
2/13/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />For the situations where the voter made no choices, <br />or fewer than the number allowed, the ideal solution <br />would be to have another oval to fill in on the ballot <br />which says "no preference" or "no choice in this <br />column" - or something that would establish that the <br />undervotewas intentional. That would significantly <br />reduce the number of ballots that the machine <br />rejects and would lighten the load on the election <br />judge who has to read the scripts. <br /> <br />Until then, an appropriate script for an unvoted blank <br />ballot would say: <br /> <br />In at least one of the races, you didn't vote <br />for anybody. Was that your intent? <br /> <br />For an unvoted choice, the script could say: <br /> <br />In at least one of the races, you didn't use <br />all three choices. Was that your intent? <br />Your second and third choices only count if <br />your previous choice is eliminated. Making <br />a second or third choice does not hurt your <br />first choice. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.