My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2012_0319
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
201x
>
2012
>
CC_Minutes_2012_0319
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/29/2012 12:19:31 PM
Creation date
3/29/2012 12:15:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/19/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday, March 19,2012 <br /> Page 10 <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that if private electrical lines remained overhead, and the cit- <br /> ies' underground, a pole would need to connect them at each business. <br /> Councilmember Pust spoke in opposition to such an unrealistic engineering <br /> choice. <br /> Councilmember McGehee concurred with the comments of Councilmember John- <br /> son, and in support of undergrounding; as well as expressing willingness to cost- <br /> share with businesses or other options to make it happen to avoid any undue eco- <br /> nomic strain to property owners. <br /> Councilmember Willmus expressed interest in pursuing the undergrounding; <br /> however, he prefaced that support on receiving hard numbers on costs and break- <br /> down of costs for business owners. Councilmember Willmus sought additional <br /> information from staff on whether property owners had an option to prepay un- <br /> dergrounding costs and receive a discount from Xcel Energy. Councilmember <br /> Willmus noted that this could provide a much-needed incentive for business own- <br /> ers. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that he would consult with Xcel to determine if they pro- <br /> vided such an incentive; noting that they did include a carrying cost in their rates. <br /> In noting that the City's Public Works, Environment and Transportation Commis- <br /> sion was currently reviewing an overall undergrounding policy for recommenda- <br /> tion to the City Council, Mayor Roe asked for a status report on the timeline for <br /> that recommendation. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that he would anticipate a 2-3 month time frame for that <br /> recommendation. <br /> Mayor Roe expressed his enthusiasm for that short of a time frame, opining that it <br /> would be great to have that recommendation in place before too many more pro- <br /> jects come forward. Mayor Roe spoke in support of looking at undergrounding <br /> for Phase II of the project, recognizing the additional steps still pending and need <br /> for another firm estimate. <br /> Mr. Schwartz advised that when the issue was brought forward to the City Coun- <br /> cil in the future, firm costs as well as negotiated terms for an agreement between <br /> the Cities of Roseville and Little Canada and Xcel Energy would be available for <br /> their deliberation and decision-making. <br /> Related to the Highway 36 corridor, Councilmember McGehee advised that her <br /> contacts with citizens had expressed interest in soundproof barriers along High- <br /> way 36 similar to those of other communities along the corridor. Councilmember <br /> McGehee noted the negative aesthetics of the sound wall from I-35 at Highway <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.