Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,March 19, 2012 <br /> Page 8 <br /> and 4); with Districts 8, 9 and 10 remaining the same, but now newly-defined as <br /> Legislative Area 66. <br /> At the request of Councilmember McGehee, City Manager Malinen confirmed <br /> that polling places would be provided in each district; and upon staff's review of <br /> each polling place, adjustments would be made as necessary and noticed in ac- <br /> cordance with State Law and the Secretary of State Office's procedures. <br /> In deliberating whether to take action on this tonight, or hold to another meeting, <br /> Councilmember Pust noted that the issue was decided by the courts, and while the <br /> City could seek additional information, they were compelled to approve it as pre- <br /> sented. <br /> McGehee moved, Johnson seconded, adoption of the precinct lines as presented in <br /> the RCA and map dated March 19, 2012. <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Willmus; Pust; McGehee; Johnson; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br /> b. Discuss Undergrounding of the Overhead Electric Lines Along Rice Street <br /> for Next Phase of Reconstruction <br /> Public Works Director Duane Schwartz reviewed options for undergrounding <br /> overhead electric lines along the Rice Street corridor in conjunction with the next <br /> phase of reconstruction by Ramsey County from Transit Avenue to County Road <br /> C-2, as detailed in RCA dated March 19, 2012. <br /> As noted in the report, Mr. Schwartz advised that Xcel Energy had provided a <br /> preliminary estimate of$1,322,343 to bury power lines for this next phase of the <br /> corridor from County Road B-2 to County Road C-2. As with Phase I of the cor- <br /> ridor reconstruction, Mr. Schwartz advised that the City of Little Canada has ex- <br /> pressed their interest in a cost-share in the undergrounding portion of the project, <br /> along similar terms as the first phase and, even though a majority of the poles are <br /> located on the Roseville side of Rice Street, their City Council has indicated their <br /> willingness to cost-share on a 50/50 basis as with Phase I. <br /> Mr. Schwartz noted that in Phase I, Xcel had applied a surcharge option to recov- <br /> er their incremental costs in Roseville, through the Community Requested Facility <br /> Surcharge (CRFS), with each rate payer of the City billed a small surcharge to <br /> their electric bill based on a city-wide formula of final, actual construction costs <br /> for the undergrounding. While Phase II is still under design, Mr. Schwartz noted <br /> that a major portion of the undergrounding would be on the Little Canada side <br /> north of County Road C, and only work occurring within your actual community <br /> would be eligible for billing under the CRFS option for Roseville. Mr. Schwartz <br />