My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0616
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0616
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2008 1:54:00 PM
Creation date
4/4/2006 11:56:57 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/16/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Regular City Council Minutes - 06/16/03 <br />Minutes -Page 32 <br />and also speaking to the potential traffic congestion. <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn and Mr. Welsch each addressed Mr. <br />Kotecki's concerns; and corrected his perception of the <br />ratio of retail and residential land uses; and advised of the <br />considerations in studying the traffic figures in the AUAR <br />as the proposed development proceeds. <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn reassured the public that City staff and <br />the City Council will be continuing in studying the <br />proposed project; and asked Mr. Welsch to provide an <br />approximate date when there may be another public <br />meeting regarding this issue. <br />Mr. Welsh responded that probably early August would be <br />the earliest public meeting at the Planning Commission <br />level. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Maschka and Kysylyczyn. <br />Nays: Kough and Klausing. <br />B. Discuss an Ordinance Mandating Distribution of Legal <br />Notices at No Charge when a Subscription Legal Paper <br />is Selected <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn questioned why there was no legal <br />opinion from the City Attorney included in the Council <br />agenda packet. <br />City Manager Beets apologized for the confusion .for not <br />being aware of Council direction. <br />Councilmember Klausing opined that it was his <br />recollection that staff would explore the request to provide <br />legal notices to those interested, and return to the City <br />Council with an approximate cost for making the notices <br />available at City expense to those not subscribing to the <br />Pioneer Press and wanted legal notices. <br />Items discussed and requested by the City Council were <br />determining a fiscal note; practical administration of <br />providing notices; separation of corporations and residents <br />in determining free notices; and incorporating the notices <br />Discuss an <br />Ordinance <br />Mandating <br />Distribution of <br />Legal Notices at No <br />Charge when a <br />Subscription Legal <br />Paper is Selected <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.