My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0818
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0818
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/30/2008 1:58:11 PM
Creation date
4/13/2006 2:16:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
8/18/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r~scII, arar~~ <br />Fr®m: Mayor John Kysylyczyn [johnk@usfamily.net] <br />Sen#: Friday, August 15, 2003 1:47 PNI <br /> <br />To: Linda.C.Hemp ~~ ~~ <br />- <br />Gc: city.council@ci.roseville.mn.us <br />Subject: RE: Leaf Pick-up and Compost <br />Lir:da, <br />The Tneet.ing minutes might tel.:. you a little about the i ssue, but they are not a word <br />ror ~s;ord account of ~ `}.> meeting. , <br />This issue has been discussed by city councils and staff for probably at least tro <br />or three years as I recall. This issue also was advertised in the newspaper for a public <br />hearing three months ago at our Public ~n~orks CoTTUnission meeting. I recall seeing the <br />notice in the paper. If you consider this a slam-dunk policy, I really have no reply to <br />this. How much more slowl~z do we need to go? Land use issues get approximately 30-45 days <br />between hearings and cduncil action. `t'his was mare? If we start giving six months or. a <br />_y~ear. between hearings and action, no one will even remember what anyone said at the <br />hearings, and people will forget half the reasons of why we are even voting on something? <br />What i.s your solution? Since three months is not goad enough, how much time do you want? <br />If you are correct that strengthened environmental laws are all the more reason to <br />continue these programs, then why is it that no other city i_n Ramsey County does this, or <br />has done this in a very long time? I don't believe that there is any city in Hennepin or <br />Anoka County that does this. Are we to believe that every other city in the Twin Cities <br />could care less about the environment? That seems to be a pretty to be a pretty bold <br />statement. How can you address this? <br />One reason the leaf program is to keep storm catch basins clean. When you don't even <br />have a majority that participates, you have little benefit. Also I imagine that years <br />ago, my waste hauler didn't take my grass an leaves for free, which they now have done for <br />years. My hauler even will give me a second wheeled can for compost, which they :gill <br />empty every week for free! My garbage company is a family owned company and is ane of the <br />cheapest in Roseville! Also, I did not know that the purpose of city government was t:~ <br />provide compost. No other city government in the Twin Cities provides free compost to <br />citizens. My neighbor makes his own compost in his own back yard. <br />While you may have had a bad experience with your waste hauler, my experience has <br />been excellent. This goes for my parents and brother also, all long-time Roseville <br />Residents. The bins are not for leaf removal; they are for grass and stick removal, this <br />according to my waste hauler. The leaves are supposed to be put in bio-degradable bags if <br />possible. My parents are in their mid 50's and maintain one full acre of property with <br />poplar, multiple oaks, maples, tons of shrubs, and about 5 different other types of tress <br />that I have never heard of. I have 1/2 acre, with three oaks, and about 7 other trees. I <br />bag everything and the hauler picks up everything. I have no interest in killing my grass <br />on the boulevard in order to stack up leaves. <br />I am glad that you stated that you would be willing to pay more for this service. I <br />have no problem continuing the service provided that the users pay for the full cost. The <br />full cost would probably run between $50-$100 per yard, no kiddir_g! <br />The referendum project did not build enough space to house all of the stuff the <br />parks and rec department must store off site. What it did Sr~as consolidate stuff which taas <br />being stored outside, or in a current city owned building that is about to fall loran, <br />because it is in such decrepit shape. En7e bought it that way, it wasn't due to bad <br />maintenance on our part. <br />Talk to the residents in Maplewood who live near their compost dump. Their case, as <br />I understand it, is in the Supreme Court, currently addressing technical issues. The meat <br />of the issue has not yet gotten to the courts. <br />Commissions give advice, and reasons for their advice. We accept or reject advice <br />and reasons. How many times do we have to send something back before it is ok to vote on? <br />1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.