My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0915
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0915
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:36:27 AM
Creation date
4/17/2006 10:24:08 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/15/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 9/15/03 <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />destruction that would occur during a future construction <br />proj ect. <br /> <br />Mr. Cox expressed his preference that the property be sold <br />as one parcel, with a new owner intending to live on the <br />property determining the future use. <br /> <br />The applicant, Gary Weldon, was not present at the <br />meeting; and Mayor Kysylyczyn closed the Public <br />Hearing at 8: 11 p.m. <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke and City Attorney Squires responded to <br />Council questions related to utility locations and <br />easements and potential costs associated with hook-up <br />and/or relocation; specific home designs related to the <br />Building Permit process; City standards and consistencies <br />with code; and Council discretion for denial through <br />findings only if a health, safety or welfare concern were <br />evident. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding potential impacts to <br />the neighborhood and limitations of Council to deny the <br />request; and rationale as the Council allows due process <br />and considers the request from a density perspective with <br />the information before them. <br /> <br />Darren Cox, Resident <br />Mr. Cox identified two issues: environmental impact to <br />the nature center at the end of the cul-de-sac that had been <br />preserved by a retired professor; and that there was no <br />precedent in this neighborhood, and sought recognition of <br />the uniqueness of the neighborhood, and offered to <br />provide additional information for Council consideration if <br />action were delayed. Mr. Cox opined that the subdivision <br />barely met the minimum setback requirements, and was <br />not consistent with the nature of the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued, with Councilmembers <br />concurring that, while they sympathized with the <br />neighbors, the law was straightforward as to rationale <br />allowed for denial. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.