Laserfiche WebLink
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br /> Date: 04/09/12 <br />Item No.: 13.a <br />Department Approval City Manager Approval <br />Item Description: Continue Discussions on a Comprehensive Performance Management Program <br />B <br />ACKGROUND <br />1 <br />At the 3/12/12 City Council meeting, the Council received an overview of a proposed Comprehensive <br />2 <br />Performance Management Program. The three Councilmembers in attendance were supportive of the <br />3 <br />concept but added that the discussion should be continued to allow the full Council to weigh in. <br />4 <br />5 <br />At the previous meeting, Staff noted that the City had undertaken a number of new initiatives designed to <br />6 <br />improve the effectiveness and sustainability of day-to-day operations while ensuring that the City’s long- <br />7 <br />term goals are met. These initiatives included a 20-year visioning process, strategic planning, citizen <br />8 <br />survey, performance measurement, and a number of long-term financial and non-financial planning <br />9 <br />exercises. Staff went on to note that these initiatives were consistent with governmental best practices and <br />10 <br />have been categorized by other cities into a broader Performance Management Program. <br />11 <br />12 <br />The Council is asked to consider establishing a formal and comprehensive Performance Management <br />13 <br />Program like other cities have. By formally establishing this Program, the Council will commit to an on- <br />14 <br />going process and operational cycle that ensures that the allocation of resources is aligned with desired <br />15 <br />outcomes. <br />16 <br />17 <br />Included in the 3/12/12 Council packet was a framework that identified a number of performance <br />18 <br />management principles and described how incorporating these principles into governmental processes and <br />19 <br />decision making can lead to systematic improvements, enhanced accountability, and better results. <br />20 <br />21 <br />This framework was developed by a joint effort of 11 leading state and local public interest associations <br />22 <br />which eventually led to the formation of the National Performance Management Advisory Commission. <br />23 <br />The Commission includes industry-leading organizations including the International City/County <br />24 <br />Management Association (ICMA), Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA), National League of <br />25 <br />Cities, and others. A copy of the Commission’s Report (framework) is included in Attachment B. <br />26 <br />27 <br />The Report (excluding appendices) is just under 50 pages long, and is somewhat technical. The Council is <br />28 <br />invited to read the full report, but a quasi-executive summary can be found beginning with the Foreword <br />29 <br />and continuing to the page 10. There are also a number of graphical depictions that give a brief snapshot of <br />30 <br />some of the main concepts behind Performance Management. They are included on pages 13 and 21. <br />31 <br />32 <br />Again, it should be noted that the City should not necessarily design its Performance Management Program <br />33 <br />Page 1 of 2 <br /> <br />