My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_1124
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_1124
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:06 AM
Creation date
4/24/2006 10:29:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/24/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
73
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 11/24/03 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />owners. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough questioned Mr. Noonan as to the <br />historical City Council vision for redevelopment of this <br />area, and whether those would be given consideration. <br /> <br />Mr. Noonan responded that positive learning visions from <br />the past, as well as contelnporary concepts, would be <br />considered and expressed his firm's preference to engage <br />the public to provide their thoughts and aspirations, and <br />seek consensus of the community and City Council as <br />appropriate. <br /> <br />In response to Councilmember Kough's expressed <br />concern, Mr. Noonan addressed the negotiation of <br />performance criteria in clear and decisive language <br />between the City of Roseville and Rottlund Con1panies <br />that would allow termination of the agreement if <br />necessary . <br /> <br />Terry Moses, 1776 Maple Lane <br />Mr. Moses spoke in favor of the RFP process, given the <br />magnitude of this project; questioned the benefit to the <br />City of Allina locating in Roseville; and opined a potential <br />conflict of interest of Ryan Companies working with <br />Allina in their proposed relocation to one of the other final <br />choice cities, that of Minneapolis. Mr. Moses summarized <br />by encouraging the involvement and potential Master <br />Developer status of Rottlund. <br /> <br />Councilmember Klausing spoke in favor of the motion; <br />opining that in another scenario, he would prefer the RFP <br />process; that Allina was consistent with the City's <br />con1prehensive plan, and could serve as an incubator for <br />further development at Twin Lakes. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn noted that consideration of Allina was <br />not included in the n10tion under discussion, and whether <br />or not they chose Roseville was not relevant to this <br />motion; and opined dislike of the RFP process, particularly <br />since the City was not the property owner at Twin Lakes. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.