My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0410
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:16 AM
Creation date
5/15/2006 11:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/10/2006
Meeting Type
Town Hall
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 04/10/06 <br />Minutes - Page 10 <br /> <br />At the request of Mayor Klausing, City Manager Beets <br />briefly reviewed the request for the HRA to cost-share <br />up to 60% of the costs for a City visioning process, at <br />an amount not to exceed $30,000. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motion, <br />opining that the large levy increase requested by the <br />HRA in the 2006 budget was for housing-related <br />programs, specifically for rental licensing purposes; <br />and that it would be fiscally irresponsible for the City <br />Council to use those funds, or contingency funds. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Pust seconded, approval of an <br />agreement between the City of Roseville and the <br />Roseville HRA for a City visioning process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka spoke in support of the <br />motion, opining that the HRA had set money aside <br />with the intent that an additional rental licensing <br />inspector may be needed, but since that had been <br />delayed until possibly late fall, using the funds for a <br />portion of the visioning process, with a large part <br />involving housing-related issues, was an appropriate <br />use of those funds, as well as use of contingency funds <br />for expenses not originally anticipated. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough opined that, while monies <br />were needed for the visioning process to go forward, <br />he was not supportive of HRA designated funds. <br />Councilmember Kough opined that he wanted to see <br />the steering committee initiated first, with the City <br />Council seeking community interest for participants, <br />along with Council suggestions, before hiring a <br />consultant. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust noted that, in discussion with <br />Bill Majerus, Chair of the HRA, the HRA was <br />planning to put together an advisory group to consider <br />various housing options prior to the Council's decision <br />to pursue the visioning process, and had set aside <br />funds to pursue a similar process; and this would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.