My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0410
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:16 AM
Creation date
5/15/2006 11:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/10/2006
Meeting Type
Town Hall
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 04/10/06 <br />Minutes - Page 25 <br /> <br />dangerous animals and the need to create regulations; and the <br />City's desire to ensure the safety of the public. <br /> <br />Chief Sletner reviewed previously addressed Council <br />concerns and staff s response to those concerns, and <br />amendments to the proposed ordinance as applicable, with <br />the exception of suggested language regarding "repeatedly," <br />as the Chief deemed that language to complicate <br />enforcement. <br /> <br />Discussion included changes in the revised version compared <br />to previous versions; and language location of "dangerous <br />animal registration" provisions in the ordinance. <br /> <br />Klausing moved, Maschka seconded, copying Item ( e) <br />related to microchip identification implants from Section B <br />(page 3 of 6) entitled, "Dangerous Animal F~egistration" <br />Section 2, to Section C entitled, "Regulation of Potentially <br />Dangerous Animals," (page 4 of 6) and identified as Item (1) <br />(d) with similar language. <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Ihlan; Kough; Maschka; Pust and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough opined that a Public Hearing was <br />needed prior to final approval; noting that he was aware of <br />several veterinarians and other citizens wanting to make <br />public comment. Councilmember Kough also expressed <br />concern regarding the definition of an aggressive dog. <br /> <br />Chief Sletner addressed public safety concerns related to <br />behavior of animals and people using City sidewalks and <br />walkways; noting the definition of dangerous animals in <br />Section 2.b. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson noted that the ordinance provided <br />that the animal, as outlined in Section A-2-b, had to be off <br />the owner's property. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust noted the language that the animal had <br />to be "in an apparent attitude of attack," not just barking, and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.