My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0410
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0410
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:16 AM
Creation date
5/15/2006 11:55:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/10/2006
Meeting Type
Town Hall
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 04/10/06 <br />Minutes - Page 26 <br /> <br />that would provide the protection sought by Councilmember <br />Kough. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that whether the animal was <br />chasing or approaching a person in an attitude of attack <br />would be the perception of that person; noting her original <br />request to include the "repeatedly" language in the <br />ordinance, Section A entitled, "Definitions," Section A. (2) <br />(b ). <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Klausing seconded, enactment of <br />Ordinance No. 1334 entitled, "An Ordinance Amending Title <br />Five, Section 501.16, Vicious Animals, as amended." <br /> <br />Kough moved, Ihlan seconded, tabling action on the motion <br />pending additional input. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br /> <br />Ayes: Ihlan and Kough. <br />Nays: Maschka; Pust and Klausing. <br />Motion failed. <br /> <br />Ihlan moved, Pust seconded, an amendment to Paragraph 2-b <br />(page 1 of 6), to add "[on repeated occasions.] when <br />unprovoked, chases or approaches a person, . . . <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of the amendment to <br />ensure that an animal was not labeled as dangerous due to <br />one instance. <br /> <br />Chief Sletner addressed the rationale for removing that <br />specific language, given the difficulty to enforce the <br />ordinance and in tracking previous complaints; noting that it <br />was the owner's responsibility to keep the dog inside their <br />yard for public safety purposes. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson asked what "on repeated occasions," <br />meant and noted that legally, "on more than one occasion," <br />would clarify the intent and potential enforcement from a <br />legal standpoint. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.