My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0424
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0424
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:26 AM
Creation date
5/15/2006 1:05:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/24/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
43
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 04/24/06 <br />Minutes - Page 20 <br /> <br />already be sufficiently monitoring grant funding sources; <br />and cautioned raising the public's expectations that funding <br />was available for special projects when it clearly was not <br />available. <br /> <br />Parks and Recreation Director Lonnie Brokke concurred <br />that staff was always monitoring funding sources; but was <br />unaware of any monies available at this time; and noted the <br />competition for grant monies, creating additional <br />challenges. Mr. Brokke further noted that the Pathway <br />Committee was formed as part of the Vista 2000; and that <br />the pathway ranking and overall community connectivity <br />needed to be reassessed. Mr. Brokke noted the time and <br />effort of the original committee; their rationale; and the <br />desire to link not just the community, but the regional trail <br />system. Mr. Brokke advised that the pathway committee <br />was meeting until approximately 2002 or 2003 to update <br />the ranking annually and make recommendations, but had <br />not met for several years, as their legitimacy was <br />questioned by the City Council at that time, when <br />discussions regarding the proposed B- 2 pathway <br />recommendations were under discussion and funding <br />sources identified, awarded, and later returned unused. <br /> <br />Mr. Brokke concurred that Ms. Reitz' request was <br />legitimate. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing opined that, while he was in favor of staff <br />pursuing pathway funding, without a discussion of the <br />overall system, he didn't feel comfortable moving this <br />segment to the top of the priority list. <br /> <br />Further discussion included whether to reinstate the <br />Pathway Committee for a review of the entire system; <br />including pathways in the community visioning process; <br />who initiates pathway requests, staff or City <br />Councilmembers; <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough opined that he preferred to <br />approach the County Commissioners to present a case for <br />this pathway segment. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.