My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2002_0114
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
CC_Minutes_2002_0114
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:49 AM
Creation date
6/20/2006 11:45:25 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/14/2002
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />~SEVfbbE <br /> <br />City Council Minutes <br />Work Session Joint with Lauderdale City Council <br />Brief Business Meeting <br />January 14, 2002 <br /> <br />The City Council met on the above date with all members present 6:35 p.m. <br />(voting order): Schroeder, Maschka, Kough, Klausing and Roll Call <br />Kysylyczyn. <br /> <br />Work Session <br /> <br />I. Review of Regular Meeting Agenda <br /> <br />II. Additional Staff Presentations <br /> <br />A. TH 280 Reconstruction - consider direction to staff TH 280 Reconstruction <br />and Minnesota Department of Transportation MnDDT Presentation <br />MnDDT <br /> <br />Kysylyczyn recognized Schwartz, who overviewed the <br />purpose of tonight's meeting. Then Frank Pafko, Area <br />Manager for MnDOT introduced his staff and the <br />principal presenter, Consultant Glen Van Wormer. <br /> <br />Van Wormer described the history of TH 280, the traffic <br />counts and accident data for that roadway, the <br />geometries of the Larpenteur interchange, funding <br />challenges, and design options for improving the <br />operation of TH280; Median Closure; Central Alignn1ent <br />Intersection; East Alignment Intersection; and West <br />Alignment Intersection. He analyzed the various options <br />in terms of engineering and safety considerations, their <br />impact on adjacent properties, and the construction <br />staging impacts of each option. Pafl<o then described <br />some financial and time parameters. <br /> <br />Klausing asked about grade and funding issues. Gill- <br />Gerbig asked about the timing of the County Road B <br />closure. Maschka asked about pavement reconstruction <br />and what triggers construction of the potential <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.