My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0508
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:57 AM
Creation date
6/20/2006 3:08:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/8/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 05/08/06 <br />Minutes - Page 22 <br /> <br />8.a <br /> <br />Request of Councilmember Ihlan to Hold Hearings on <br />Alcohol Violations and Penalties for Past Years <br />Ihlan moved, Kough seconded, that the City Council <br />schedule public hearings as required under previous 2005 <br />Roseville Code 302.15 to determine whether mandatory <br />minimum penalties (including one-day license suspensions) <br />should be enforced for 2005 alcohol compliance check <br />failures of three businesses within the community. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough questioned whether it would be <br />appropriate to rescind previous action of the City Manager <br />and renew violations. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson advised that he would need to <br />further consider that issue before providing a legal opinion. <br /> <br />Substantial discussion ensued regarding staff action; the <br />actual offenses and consequences; potential litigation <br />issues; mandatory minimums or presumptive minimums; <br />and Council deviation in individual cases. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued related to minimum mandatory <br />penalties; ordinance interpretation; the alcohol compliance <br />program; education and training programs. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in opposition to the motion. <br /> <br />Further Council debate ensued as Councilmember Ihlan <br />appeared to interpret individual Councilmember intent. <br />Councilmember Ihlan requested a roll call vote on this <br />motion. <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn provided his historical perspective of the <br />adoption of the previous liquor compliance ordinance in <br />2000; and disputed various comments made by Mayor <br />Klausing related to rationale for not re-hearing the three <br />2005 non-compliance cases currently under discussion; and <br />opined that the private information should be made public. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson clarified his rationale for providing <br /> <br />Hold Hearings on <br />Alcohol Violations <br />and Penalties for <br />Past Years <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.