Laserfiche WebLink
recommendation by the Public Works Environment and Transportation Commission (PWETC) <br />before final action by the City Council. If the feasibility report is adopted and the preliminary <br />assessment roll is approved by the City Council, the project is ordered. If the feasibility report <br />and preliminary assessment roll are not adopted by the Council, the plans and specifications will <br />not be ordered and the project will be terminated. The project will thereafter be removed from <br />the list and the Benefited Area is not allowed to reapply for a same or similar study for five <br />years. <br />Step 10 –Design, Final Assessment Roll and Construction <br />Final design and construction supervision are administered by the City and are generally <br />completed within 12 months after final approval and assessment by the City Council. City staff <br />prepares and recommends the final assessment roll as required under authority granted by <br />Minnesota Statute Chapter 429. <br />Step 11 -Monitoring and Future Actions <br />The City will conduct periodic monitoring of the fully installed traffic management strategy to <br />determine if the project continues to provide effective improvement to the neighborhood.The <br />monitoring will be conducted at the discretion of the City based on available funding, staffing <br />levels, and resident comments. <br />If monitoring shows that the implemented strategy fails to achieve the intended goals it may be <br />removed. <br />Legal Considerations <br />From the local government perspective, the legal issues surrounding traffic management <br />strategies fall into three categories: statutory authority, constitutionality, and tort liability. <br />First,the local government must have legal authority to implement traffic management <br />strategies ona given roadway (statutory authority). Second, the local government must <br />respect theconstitutional rights of affected landowners and travelers on the roadways <br />(constitutionality).And finally, the local government must take steps to minimize the risk <br />to travelers from theinstallation of traffic management strategies (tort liability).Through <br />documentation of the entireprocess, including the collection and evaluation of traffic <br />data, the decision process, andinteraction with the public, theRosevilleTraffic <br />Management Program can minimize potentiallegal difficulties. <br />Appeals <br />Decisions of staff can be appealed to the City Council. The appeals process will follow <br />established City procedures. <br />Removal <br />The Traffic Management Program is intended to avoid the costly installation and later <br />costly removal of traffic management strategies. On occasion, however, it may be <br />determined to be desirable to remove a traffic management strategy installed under the <br />Program. <br />If the removal is City initiated due to safety/ crash/ complaint issues, the removal will be <br />at City expense. If the removal request is at the request of the Benefited Area, the <br />removal will be charged to the property owners in the defined Benefited Area. The <br />request will be processed generally using the same procedures as outlined in this <br />program requiring written request and appropriate neighborhood approval. <br />12 City Council Review Draft- 4/06/12 <br /> <br />