Laserfiche WebLink
HRA Meeting <br />Minutes – Tuesday, February 21, 2012 <br />Page 8 <br />1 <br />that the HRA may not be. Mr. Trudgeon also suggested linking that agency perspective to the <br />2 <br />broader senior service issue. <br />3 <br />4 <br />Chair Maschka noted that those agencies were all feeling the financial pressures and stresses at <br />5 <br />this time as well; with Mr. Trudgeon noting that those stresses may be manifesting in the <br />6 <br />community as well. <br />7 <br />8 <br />Ms. Kelsey suggested that a survey be provided to those organizations seeking their feedback <br />9 <br />to avoid burdening them time-wise; and offered staff following-up with them to encourage <br />10 <br />their participation and the HRA’s need for hearing their perspective. <br />11 <br />12 <br />Member Pust suggested that there may be some stakeholders that the HRA Board would want <br />13 <br />to hear from directly, rather than just reading reports (e.g. AEON), given their knowledge and <br />14 <br />expertise of the area marketing and housing stock. However, due to time constraints, Member <br />15 <br />Pust recognized that presentations couldn’t be heard from all stakeholders. <br />16 <br />17 <br />Ms. Kelsey noted that recent presentation “Navigating the New Normal,” and advised that <br />18 <br />AEON finance representatives attended that work shop; and encouraged individual HRA <br />19 <br />Board members to watch the presentation. <br />20 <br />21 <br />Mr. Trudgeon advised that staff could make the presentation available to the HRA Board. <br />22 <br />23 <br />Member Majerus suggested that the Imagine Roseville 2025 community visioning documents <br />24 <br />be revisited as part of this strategic plan update as well. <br />25 <br />26 <br />Ms. Raye thanked members for their comments; and advised that the on-line survey should be <br />27 <br />available within the next few days; and asked that individual HRA Board members advised <br />28 <br />other potential stakeholders of the survey and encourage their participation. <br />29 <br />30 <br />At the request of Mr. Trudgeon, Ms. Raye reviewed the upcoming schedule: <br />31 <br />March HRA meeting <br />32 <br />Discuss some of the findings/data from the survey; and initial review of implications and/or <br />33 <br />priorities requiring additional research <br />34 <br />April HRA meeting <br />35 <br />Integrate that additional data/research; review best practices comparative data; preliminary <br />36 <br />scenarios and strategies for potential consideration <br />37 <br />May HRA meeting <br />38 <br />Further refine updated strategies <br />39 <br />Saturday Work Session <br />40 <br />Focus on integration of the information and establish strategic options for the HRA Board <br />41 <br />42 <br />9. Action/Discussion Items <br />43 <br />44 <br />a.Approve 2012 Budget <br />45 <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that the HRA 2012 budget had initially been adopted in June of 2011 and <br />46 <br />presented to the City Council, based on available assumptions at that time. Since that time, <br />47 <br />Mr. Trudgeon noted that the City Council had approved the budget and levy in December of <br />48 <br />2011; with the amended final 2012 Budget (Fund 723) reviewed by the HRA Finance <br />49 <br />Subcommittee (Members Maschka, Masche and Majerus) and presented to the full Board <br />50 <br />tonight for their consideration and approval. Mr. Trudgeon highlighted cost savings and <br />51 <br />unexpected revenues, representing further refinement; and specifically noted the unexpected <br />52 <br />payoff of the loan for 2018 Hamline Avenue, with some but not all of those funds restricted. <br />53 <br />54 <br />Member Majerus left the meeting at this time, approximately 7:12 p.m. <br />55 <br /> <br />