My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2002_0506
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
CC_Minutes_2002_0506
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:39:38 AM
Creation date
8/9/2006 12:52:39 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/6/2002
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Minutes - 05/06/02 <br />Page 7 <br /> <br />Schroeder asked for clarification about two features: the <br />latter half of the mission statement and the first sentence <br />in the policy statement. <br />Kysylyczyn encouraged deletions to the draft statements. <br />Klausing spoke in favor of the version in the Council <br />packet, if a policy is going to be adopted. <br />Kough commented that the policy was fairly good. <br />Schroeder deferred to the City Attorney's reasons for <br />writing the policy as set forth in the Council packet. <br />Maschka asked about how the policy would work from <br />an enforcement standpoint, and indicated his opposition <br />to the motion. <br />Kysylyczyn suggested two friendly amendments to the <br />motion: delete the word "city" and insert the word "any" <br />before the word "business" in the third paragraph of the <br />policy following the mission statement; delete the words <br />"concerns and" from the fourth and final paragraph of <br />the policy. Schroeder accepted these proposed changes <br />as part of his motion. <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Schroeder, Klausing, Kough, and <br />Kysylyczyn. Nays: Maschka. <br /> <br />VII. <br /> <br />Ordinances & Resolutions <br />A. Ordinance Amending Chapter 10, Section 1005 and <br />1002 and Adding Section 1017 to the City Code by <br />Adding Regulations Relating to Sexually Oriented <br />Business Uses (PF3394) <br />J arnnik presented. <br />Kough asked about the legality of nude model studios <br />under the proposed ordinance. <br />Maschka asked about the legality of certain magazines. <br />Kough asked about the legality of certain videos. <br /> <br />Kysylyczyn moved, Schroeder seconded, to adopt a <br />resolution of findings of fact as recommended by the <br />Planning Commission, and to request public comment on <br />the first reading of the ordinance. <br />Roll Call, Ayes: Schroeder, Maschka, Klausing, Kough <br />and Kysylyczyn. Nays: none. <br /> <br />Kysylyczyn moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve the <br />first reading of an ordinance which adds new language <br /> <br />Resolution 9992 <br />First Reading <br />Of an Ordinance <br />Opportunity/Control <br />Sexually Oriented <br />Uses (PF3394) <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.